For patients
Understanding your results
A Measura report is not a verdict. It is a set of measurements with reference ranges beside them, and the useful part is usually the pattern rather than any single number.
How the report is organized
Results are grouped the way the body is organized, not the way the machines are.
| Section | What it answers |
|---|---|
| Circulation | Is blood reaching the limbs at normal pressure, and how rigid have the arteries become? |
| Small nerve fibers | Are the smallest nerves — the ones that control sweating and sensation — intact? |
| Autonomic function | Does the nervous system still adjust heart rate and blood pressure the way it should? |
| Body composition | How much of your weight is lean tissue, fat and water? |
| Metabolism | How much energy do you burn at rest, and what fuel are you predominantly using? |
| Balance | Is the vestibular system working, and what is the objective fall risk? |
| Cognition | What is your baseline on a structured screening instrument? |
Three things to know before you read it
A single abnormal number is a question, not an answer
Any of these measurements can be moved by a bad night’s sleep, a cup of coffee, a new medication, dehydration or an ordinary viral illness. That is exactly why they are read together and why a genuinely abnormal result usually gets repeated before anything is concluded from it.
A normal number does not always mean normal
The clearest example is the ankle-brachial index. When arteries are heavily calcified — common in long-standing diabetes and in kidney disease — they resist compression, the cuff reads falsely high, and the index can look normal or even elevated in a limb with real disease. That is precisely why pulse volume recording is done alongside it: the waveform shape does not depend on the vessel being compressible.
The trend beats the snapshot
The single most useful thing about these measurements is that they can be repeated. A stiffness index that has not moved in two years is reassuring in a way that no first reading can be, and one that has moved is actionable while it is still early.
What happens next
The report is reviewed with a clinician who knows your history. Depending on what it shows, that conversation ends in one of four places: nothing needs doing and you repeat in a year; something needs confirming with a further study; something needs referring; or something needs treating — usually starting with the modifiable inputs that move these numbers most.
Measura does not treat anything. The report exists so the person who does treat you is working from measurement instead of impression.
If you are a clinician: the same subject written for the person ordering the test is at interpreting the report.
Talk to someone about testing
Tell us what you are trying to find out and we will explain which Measura assessments answer that question, what each one involves, and how the results are reviewed with a clinician.
4477 Woodson Rd, Suite 201, St. Louis, MO 63134. Monday to Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Please do not send symptoms, diagnoses or images through a web form — a website form is not a secure medical channel. Call us with clinical detail.
Common questions
My ankle-brachial index was normal but my legs still hurt. Why?
Either the arteries are calcified and the index is falsely reassuring, or the pain is not vascular. Both are answerable with the rest of the study. Why a normal index can mislead.
What is a good heart rate variability number?
There is no single good number — it depends heavily on age, medication and what you did the day before. The comparison that matters is against yourself over time. What the number means.
Can I take this report to my own doctor?
Yes, and that is what it is designed for. Getting results into the chart.
How much of this is reversible?
More than people expect for the metabolic and autonomic measures, less for established structural arterial disease — which is the argument for measuring early. What insulin resistance looks like before diabetes.
References
- Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, et al. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126(24):2890–2909. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318276fbcb
Medically reviewed by Dr. Gurpreet Singh Padda, MD, MBA, MHP, medical director of Measura. Last reviewed .