HPA axis dysfunction · Chronic pain
HPA Axis Dysfunction in Chronic Pain: What to Measure Beyond Cortisol
Screen for HPA axis dysfunction in chronic pain by exposure history and downstream measures rather than a morning cortisol. Glucose, triglycerides, body composition and heart rate variability carry the signal; in one prospective study, triglycerides, waist-to-hip ratio and resting pulse predicted chronic back pain where hair cortisol did not.
In chronic pain the stress axis runs high in some patients, low in others and flat in many. The screening question is not the cortisol value but which downstream measures carry the signal.
HPA axis dysfunction is one of the most frequently invoked and least usefully measured concepts in chronic pain care. The instinct is to order a morning cortisol. The evidence says that value will rarely answer the clinical question, because in pain populations the axis is dysregulated in both directions, and what it does downstream is easier to document than the hormone itself.
The source is Chapter 8 of The Pained Brain by Dr. Gurpreet Singh Padda, MD, MBA, MHP, and Dr. KrisJay Fucanan, MD, and the chapter video above.
Can a cortisol test diagnose HPA axis dysfunction?
The most cited prospective study tested the axis in 267 psychologically at-risk adults without chronic widespread pain. Failure to suppress after dexamethasone carried an odds ratio of 3.53 for incident pain, and all three abnormalities together 8.5, but the base was 28 incident cases, and low morning saliva alone was not significant. A larger Dutch cohort of 2,039 adults followed six years found that no HPA measure predicted onset; the count of adverse life events did, at 1.14 per event.
In established pain the picture is bidirectional. Among 4,560 older English adults, chronic pain was associated with hair cortisol 15 percent higher at the low tail of the distribution and 19 percent higher near the top, with no difference in between. In 99 fibromyalgia patients, perceived stress was markedly higher than in controls while neither salivary nor hair cortisol differed. What does track outcomes is the diurnal slope: across 80 studies and 36,823 participants, a flatter slope was associated with poorer health, most strongly immune and inflammatory outcomes, and with mortality at a hazard of 2.40, or 1.63 after two outliers were removed, with evidence of publication bias.
The most instructive null came from 140 young adults with intermittent back pain. Hair cortisol was not selected as a predictor of chronic low back pain at one year. The markers that were selected were norepinephrine, interleukin-6, triglycerides, waist-to-hip ratio and resting pulse, with a development AUC of 0.93 falling to 0.88 after bootstrapping and no external validation. The stress system was visible in metabolic and autonomic variables. The hormone concentration was not.
Can cortisol be normal when the stress axis is not?
Receptor-level resistance explains part of the gap. In 33 caregivers of family members with glioblastoma, monocytes showed 1.65-fold greater NF-κB binding-motif prevalence and 0.68-fold lower glucocorticoid receptor motif prevalence, with diurnal cortisol and receptor protein similar to controls. The same study found no group difference in functional sensitivity once normalized, so this is transcriptional rather than demonstrated functional resistance. The practical point is that a reassuring cortisol value can coexist with an inflammatory phenotype.
Which life exposures point to HPA axis dysfunction?
Exposure history identifies risk better than a hormone draw, and almost none of it is on a standard intake form. Reasonable criteria in a pain or primary care population include:
- Adverse childhood experience: across 85 studies and 826,452 adults the adjusted odds of adult chronic pain were 1.45, graded from 1.29 for one experience to 1.95 for four or more, although most included studies were cross-sectional.
- Sustained financial hardship: hardship at 43 predicted chronic widespread pain at 68 with a relative risk of 4.44 in the most hard-pressed group, adjusted for measured body mass and psychiatric caseness.
- High perceived occupational stress: among 715 healthcare workers without baseline back pain, high stress carried an odds ratio of 2.67 for low back pain a year later.
- Loneliness rather than living alone: in 315,197 UK Biobank participants, loneliness carried a hazard of 1.32 for low back pain after broad adjustment, while objective isolation raised nothing.
- Caregiving and job strain, which also carry metabolic risk: job strain raised the hazard of type 2 diabetes 1.15-fold across 124,808 adults, and three or more work-stress exposures carried 2.25 times the odds of the metabolic syndrome among 10,308 civil servants.
These map onto the practice criteria in selection criteria for testing. The ten-item Perceived Stress Scale, banded 0-9 low, 10-19 moderate and 20-40 high in the prospective work, is a reasonable repeated documentation field alongside them.
What should be measured instead of cortisol?
The downstream record is where Measura [Cardiometabolic and Autonomic Health Analysis] fits. It is a measurement protocol reported to the ordering physician, not a diagnostic or treatment service in its own right.
- Laboratory panels for glucose, triglycerides and related metabolic markers, the variables that carried prospective signal where cortisol did not.
- Bioimpedance body composition to document fat and lean compartments, since waist circumference in the hair-cortisol cohorts is a proxy rather than a measure of visceral fat.
- Heart rate variability as an autonomic baseline. Across 52 studies of chronic primary pain, higher baseline cortisol accompanied lower recovery heart rate variability, at very low to moderate certainty.
- Cardiac autonomic reflex tests where symptoms suggest broader autonomic involvement beyond resting variability.
- A cognitive assessment baseline in older patients, given the imaging association between higher cortisol and smaller hippocampal volume in chronic back pain.
Trapezius pressure-pain algometry, which tracked perceived stress in 2,199 adults, is a clinic test outside this library.
What a finding changes
A documented pattern moves stress from a dismissal to a treatment target, and the sober effect sizes belong in the conversation. In 342 adults with chronic low back pain, mindfulness-based stress reduction produced meaningful functional improvement in 60.5 percent at 26 weeks, cognitive behavioral therapy in 57.7 percent and usual care in 44.1 percent. Pain reprocessing therapy left 66 percent of 151 adults with mild to moderate back pain at or near zero pain against 20 percent with placebo injection. Against an active control, the Cochrane estimate for cognitive behavioral therapy on pain intensity was only 0.09, which argues for setting expectations around function and distress. In 73 adults with PTSD and chronic pain, heart rate variability biofeedback cut pain interference 24.9 percent without a between-group difference in intensity, a direct reason to repeat the autonomic measure.
Interventional care belongs in the same plan. Of 14 back pain patients rescanned six months after spine surgery or facet injection, left dorsolateral prefrontal thickness had recovered in step with falling pain and disability. Quieting the signal buys the window for retraining the axis; repeat measures show whether the terrain moved.
Documentation and workflow
Dr. Padda’s position is that the profession has to stop charting stress as a verdict: in a survey of people with chronic pain, 77 percent described provider invalidation, which was associated with poorer physical function. Writing the mechanism into the record, with exposures and measures attached, is the correction. A standing order triggered by a documented exposure plus a pain diagnosis makes the workup reproducible; see standing orders for screening. The annual wellness visit is the natural repeat point, covered in annual wellness visit integration, and the same cardiometabolic documentation supports MIPS and HEDIS quality concepts. Unmeasured is unmanaged. Study-level detail is in the Chapter 8 companion supplement, the sleep side of the same clock is sleep deprivation and insulin resistance screening, and a patient-facing version is available for handouts.
Frequently asked questions
Is a morning serum cortisol useful for suspected HPA axis dysfunction in chronic pain?
Rarely on its own. The prospective signal came from failed dexamethasone suppression, not a morning level, and a larger cohort found no HPA measure predicted onset. Population data show associations at both tails of the cortisol distribution, and fibromyalgia samples show normal or low values. The diurnal slope and downstream metabolic and autonomic markers are more informative. Interpreting the report.
Which exposures should prompt a stress-axis workup?
Graded adverse childhood experience, sustained financial hardship, high perceived work stress, loneliness, caregiving and job strain all carry prospective or dose-dependent associations with chronic pain or metabolic disease. None appear on a typical intake form. Documenting them as structured fields, with a repeated Perceived Stress Scale score, gives a standing order something objective to trigger on. Why metabolic health belongs in a pain practice.
Where does heart rate variability fit?
It measures the autonomic arm of the stress response, which cortisol does not capture. In chronic primary pain, higher cortisol accompanied lower recovery heart rate variability across 52 studies, and resting pulse was among the variables that predicted chronic back pain where hair cortisol failed. It also gives a repeatable measure when biofeedback or behavioral treatment is used. Specialty applications.
How should the results be documented?
As mechanism, not as a label. Record the exposures, the perceived stress score, the metabolic and body composition values and the autonomic measures in structured fields so they can be trended and repeated at the annual wellness visit. That turns a note reading stress into a measurable problem list entry. Getting results into the record.
Does treating the pain change the stress-related brain findings?
Imaging suggests it can. Ten hip arthritis patients rescanned after joint replacement left them without pain showed gray matter increases in four regions within six weeks to four months, and back pain patients showed prefrontal cortex recovery six months after interventional or surgical treatment. Both samples are small, without sham control. What changes for the patient.
Can HPA axis dysfunction cause low cortisol as well as high?
Yes. In chronic pain the stress axis runs high in some patients, low in others and flat in many. Among 4,560 older English adults, chronic pain went with higher hair cortisol at both the low tail and the top of the distribution, with no difference in the middle. In fibromyalgia, perceived stress was markedly higher while salivary and hair cortisol did not differ from controls.
How is HPA axis dysfunction diagnosed in chronic pain?
Not with a single morning cortisol. The prospective signal came from failed dexamethasone suppression, and what tracks outcomes is a flatter daily cortisol slope. In practice, screening starts with exposure history and then documents the downstream record: glucose, triglycerides, body composition and heart rate variability. In one prospective study, triglycerides, waist-to-hip ratio and resting pulse predicted chronic back pain where hair cortisol did not.
Can chronic stress lead to back pain?
The prospective data say it can. Among 715 healthcare workers without back pain, high perceived work stress carried an odds ratio of 2.67 for low back pain a year later. Loneliness carried a hazard of 1.32 for low back pain in 315,197 UK Biobank participants, and sustained financial hardship at 43 predicted chronic widespread pain at 68 with a relative risk of 4.44.
Turn stress into a measured problem list entry
Learn how the Measura protocol fits a pain or primary care practice, from exposure-based selection criteria to results documented in the chart.
4477 Woodson Rd, Suite 201, St. Louis, MO 63134. Monday to Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Please do not send symptoms, diagnoses or images through a web form — a website form is not a secure medical channel. Send your name and number and we will call you back.
References
- McBeth, J., Silman, A. J., Gupta, A., Chiu, Y. H., Ray, D., Morriss, R., Dickens, C., King, Y., & Macfarlane, G. J. (2007). Moderation of psychosocial risk factors through dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis in the onset of chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain: findings of a population-based prospective cohort study.
- Generaal, E., Vogelzangs, N., Macfarlane, G. J., Geenen, R., Smit, J. H., de Geus, E. J., Penninx, B. W., & Dekker, J. (2015). Biological stress systems, adverse life events and the onset of chronic multisite musculoskeletal pain: a 6-year cohort study.
- Adam, E. K., Quinn, M. E., Tavernier, R., McQuillan, M. T., Dahlke, K. A., & Gilbert, K. E. (2017). Diurnal cortisol slopes and mental and physical health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Miller, G. E., Murphy, M. L. M., Cashman, R., Ma, R., Ma, J., Arevalo, J. M. G., Kobor, M. S., & Cole, S. W. (2014). Greater inflammatory activity and blunted glucocorticoid signaling in monocytes of chronically stressed caregivers.
- Bussières, A., Hancock, M. J., Elklit, A., Ferreira, M. L., Ferreira, P. H., Stone, L. S., Wideman, T. H., Boruff, J. T., Al Zoubi, F., Chaudhry, F., Tolentino, R., & Hartvigsen, J. (2023). Adverse childhood experience is associated with an increased risk of reporting chronic pain in adulthood: a stystematic review and meta-analysis.
- Ma, X., Song, X., Zou, Y., Zhang, D., Yang, B., Lei, B., Zhou, J., Zhao, X., Xiang, R., Qu, Y., Zheng, S., Yu, T., Han, T., Zhong, Y., Xia, M., Fan, M., Jiang, X., & Zhang, B. (2026). Loneliness, traditional risk factor control, genetic predisposition, and development of musculoskeletal disorders.
- Vyverman, J., De Baere, R., Timmers, I., Coppieters, I., Van Oosterwijck, J., & Moerkerke, M. (2026). The stress-pain connection in chronic primary pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of physiological stress markers in relation to experimental pain responses.
- Cherkin, D. C., Sherman, K. J., Balderson, B. H., Cook, A. J., Anderson, M. L., Hawkes, R. J., Hansen, K. E., & Turner, J. A. (2016). Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Usual Care on Back Pain and Functional Limitations in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Williams, A. C. de C., Fisher, E., Hearn, L., & Eccleston, C. (2020). Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults.
- Seminowicz, D. A., Wideman, T. H., Naso, L., Hatami-Khoroushahi, Z., Fallatah, S., Ware, M. A., Jarzem, P., Bushnell, M. C., Shir, Y., Ouellet, J. A., & Stone, L. S. (2011). Effective treatment of chronic low back pain in humans reverses abnormal brain anatomy and function.
Related reading
- Sleep Deprivation and Insulin Resistance: Who to Screen in Pain Care
- Fibromyalgia and Small Fiber Neuropathy: Screening the Terrain
- Laboratory Panels
Medically reviewed by Dr. Gurpreet Singh Padda, MD, MBA, MHP, medical director of Measura. Last reviewed .